Skip to main content

Year 2

  • 246 students completed the program
  • We had two cohorts. Cohort A met on Monday and Cohort B met on Tuesdays.

Data Highlights

Two hundred forty-seven students completed the program in AY 2024–2025 (Year 2). We averaged the following data across all six dinners. Students responded “Strongly / Somewhat Agree” to the following: 

  • Structure and techniques used by the facilitators made for inclusive conversations: 96%
  • I felt like a valued member of the dinner discussion: 96%
  • I felt comfortable sharing my opinion: 95%
  • The discussion provided opportunities for me to learn from my peers: 97%

Evaluation Executive Summary

WEC (Wisconsin Evaluation Collaborative) conducted an outside evaluation on our initiative every year through data collection and observations.

View the Year Two Evaluation Executive Summary (PDF)

Excerpt from the Year Two Evaluation of the UW-Madison Deliberation Dinners

Students consistently described the Deliberation Dinners as a transformative experience that improved their ability to engage in civil discourse. A major theme was the development of stronger listening skills and greater open-mindedness. One student shared, “I don’t interrupt as much, I wait and actually listen,” while another reflected, “It helped me be a better listener, honestly.” Many described a shift from reacting quickly to taking time to understand others’ views: “It made me reflect more before responding,” and “It slowed me down, in a good way.” This shift also included deeper curiosity about differing perspectives. As one student put it, “I think I’m more curious now when people say something I disagree with,” and another added, “I started to try to understand why they think what they think.” These changes helped students move away from a need to “win” arguments. “Made me realize I don’t always need to be right, just to understand,” one student explained. Observers also noted student exchanges that indicated they were trying to listen and understand others’ viewpoints. For example, some of the student statements documented include: “Just to clarify, are you considering…;” “What I thought I heard you say…;” and “Can you elaborate…”


Respectful and calm dialogue was another key outcome. Students noted that they became less defensive and more intentional in how they communicated. “I think that I am less defensive about it now than I used to be,” said one, while another shared, “Even when I feel strongly, I try to express it gently.” Several students mentioned how tone and demeanor influenced the quality of their conversations: “Made me notice how much tone matters,” and “I try not to escalate anymore, I keep it low-key like we did in the dinners.” These skills didn’t stay confined to the dinner table. Students reported applying them in real-life settings: “I think these skills that I’ve learned have definitely carried into how I talk about politics with my friends,” and “I tried it at Thanksgiving dinner and it actually helped!” Others mentioned using techniques like paraphrasing and acknowledging before disagreeing: “Now I use that technique of paraphrasing what someone said before responding,” and “I remember the ‘acknowledge before disagreeing’ thing, it really works.”

2024 Fall Semester Dates

Location: Symphony Hall in Gordon Dining Hall on East Johnson Street

Group A (Mondays)

  1. September 30, 2024
  2. October 28, 2024
  3. November 18, 2024

Group B (Tuesdays)

  1. October 1, 2024
  2. October 29, 2024
  3. November 19, 2024

2025 Spring Semester Dates

Location: Great Hall in Memorial Union

Group A (Mondays)

  1. January 27, 2025
  2. February 17, 2025
  3. March 3, 2025

Group B (Tuesdays)

  1. January 28, 2025
  2. February 18, 2025
  3. March 4, 2025

Issue Questions Discussed at Each Dinner

1. Should marijuana be legalized, regulated, and taxed in Wisconsin?

2. What should future U.S. foreign policy on aid to Ukraine be? 

3. Should Wisconsin expand nuclear power generation capacity?

4. Should Wisconsin change its gun regulations?

5. What abortion policies should Wisconsin have?

6. What should Wisconsin do about school vouchers?

Chancellor sitting at a table with a group of students.
Group of students sitting around a table and wearing red shirts.
A group of seven students having a discussion at a table.

Faculty and Academic Staff Facilitators

Monday Cohort

Facilitator Department School/College
Ajay Sethi
Population Health Sciences
School of Medicine & Public Health
Carlos Benítez Barrera
Communication Sciences and Disorders
L&S
David O’Brien
Educational Policy Studies
Education
Diana Rodríguez-Gómez
Educational Policy Studies
Education
Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen
History
L&S
Jeri Barak
Plant Pathology
Agricultural & Life Sciences
Jerome Camal
Anthropology
L&S
Karen Kopacek
Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research Division and Office of Student Affairs
Pharmacy
LJ Randolph
World Language Education, Curriculum & Instruction
Education
Pam McGranahan
Nursing, Director of the Doctorate of Nursing (DNP) program
Nursing
Robert Nix
Human Development & Family
Human Ecology
Shamya Karumbaiah
Educational Psychology
Education

Tuesday Cohort

Facilitator Department School/College
Aja Watkins
Philosophy
L&S
Andrew Stevens
Agricultural and Applied Economics
Agricultural & Life Sciences
Catalina Toma
Communication Arts
L&S
Gwen Eudey
Economics & Finance, Investment and Banking
L&S
Joe Conti
Sociology
L&S
Kassem Fawaz
Electrical & Computer
Engineering
Maria Widmer
Administration
L&S
Mike Shapiro
Engineering
Engineering
Nathan Jung
Engineering
Engineering
Rahul Chatterjee
Computer Science
L&S
Rommel Javier Jimenez
Bachelor of Business Administration
Wisconsin School of Business
Taylor Odle
Educational Policy Studies
Education
Harry Brighouse (Sub for both days)
Philosophy
L&S